|

Publications :: Alphabetical
List
Public Policy Applications of Life-Cycle
Assessment
|
Contents:
| Executive
Summary |
1 |
| |
| Chapter
1: Life-Cycle Assessment |
7 |
| |
| 1.1 Introduction |
7 |
| 1.2 References |
9 |
| |
| Chapter
2: A Conceptual Framework for the Application
of the Life-Cycle Concept and Life-Cycle
Assessment to Public Policy |
11 |
| |
| 2.1 Life-cycle
concept |
11 |
| 2.2 Life-cycle
concept qualitative to quantitative |
13 |
| 2.3 Life-cycle
assessment |
13 |
| 2.4 Life-cycle
concept and public policy |
14 |
| 2.5 Systems
approach to public policy for the environment |
15 |
| 2.6 Basic
technology decision process and policy
instruments |
16 |
| |
| 2.6.1
Regulatory policies |
18 |
| 2.6.2
Economic and technology policies |
19 |
| 2.6.3
Information dissemination and education |
20 |
| |
| 2.7 Summary |
20 |
| 2.8 References |
20 |
| |
| Chapter
3: Environmental labeling |
21 |
| |
| 3.1 Introduction |
21 |
| 3.2 Background
on environmental labeling |
21 |
| |
| 3.2.1
Goals of environmental labeling |
21 |
| 3.2.2
Types of environmental labeling |
22 |
| |
| 3.3 Status
of life-cycle approaches in environmental
labeling |
24 |
| |
| 3.3.1
Use of life-cycle approaches in third-party
seal-of-approval programs |
24 |
| 3.3.2
Use of life-cycle approaches in specific
claims declarations |
25 |
| 3.3.3
Use of LCA in CA environmental information
labeling |
28 |
| |
| 3.4 Framework
for the use of life-cycle approaches
in environmental labeling |
28 |
| 3.5 Technical
assessment of the application of life-cycle
approaches to environmental labeling |
31 |
| |
| 3.5.1
Tools for life-cycle approaches in environmental
labeling programs |
31 |
| 3.5.2
Technical issues in I'D LCA in environmental
labeling programs |
35 |
| 3.5.3
Strengths and weaknesses of more qualitative
versus more I'D approaches in environmental
labeling |
37 |
| |
| 3.6 Measuring
the effectiveness of life-cycle approaches
in ecolabeling programs |
38 |
| |
| 3.6.1
Why measure? |
39 |
| 3.6.2
Who measures? |
39 |
| 3.6.3
What should be measured: specific issued
to address in a performance review |
39 |
| 3.6.4
Timing of the performance review |
40 |
| |
| 3.7 Stakeholder
involvement in the use of life-cycle
approaches in environmental labeling |
40 |
| 3.8 Communication
of life-cycle approaches used in environmental
labeling programs |
42 |
| |
| 3.8.1
Generic communications requirements |
42 |
| 3.8.2
Third-party seal-of-approval programs |
43 |
| 3.8.3
Specific claims declarations |
43 |
| 3.8.4
Quantified product information labels |
43 |
| |
| 3.9 Conclusions
and recommendations |
43 |
| 3.10 References |
44 |
| |
| Chapter
4: Acquisition and Procurement |
47 |
| |
| 4.1.1
Scope |
47 |
| 4.1.2
Definitions |
47 |
| 4.1.3
Environmental considerations in the
acquisition process |
48 |
| 4.1.4
Stakeholders |
48 |
| 4.1.5
The role of life-cycle concepts in acquisition
and procurement |
48 |
| |
| 4.2 General
concepts and issues |
49 |
| |
| 4.2.1
Who is a stakeholder? |
49 |
| 4.2.2
Consensus |
51 |
| 4.2.3
Valuation |
52 |
| 4.2.4
The unique nature of the customer in
public procurement |
53 |
| 4.2.5
Interdependence of stakeholders, consensus,
and valuation |
54 |
| 4.2.6
Win-win opportunities |
54 |
| 4.2.7
Simplicity vs. complexity |
55 |
| 4.2.8
Small business considerations |
55 |
| |
| 4.3.1
A closer look at an acquisition process
the DoD process |
56 |
| 4.3.2
System engineering approach the Saturn
example |
59 |
| |
| 4.4 Procurement
of environmentally preferable products
and services |
60 |
| |
| 4.4.1
Goal |
60 |
| 4.4.2
Environmentally preferred products and
services |
60 |
| 4.4.3
Issues |
67 |
| |
| 4.5 Conceptual
toolbox methods: applicable to acquisition
and procurement |
68 |
| |
| 4.5.1
Tools used in the acquisition process |
68 |
| 4.5.2
Tools applicable to procurement decisions |
69 |
| 4.5.3
Economic accounting tools |
69 |
| 4.5.4
Non-economic metrics used in analysis |
70 |
| |
| 4.6 Implementation |
71 |
| 4.7 Summary
of key findings |
73 |
| 4.8 Future
needs |
74 |
| |
| 4.8.1
Acquisition |
74 |
| 4.8.2
Procurement |
74 |
| 4.8.3
Tools and metrics |
74 |
| |
| Chapter
5: Policy and Regulations |
77 |
| |
| 5.1 Goals
of using life-cycle concepts in public
policy |
77 |
| |
| 5.1.1
Goal |
77 |
| 5.1.2
Observations |
78 |
| |
| 5.2 Generic
framework for applying life-cycle concepts
to public policy |
79 |
| 5.3 Case
study comparison of municipal solid
waste management options using a life-cycle
assessment |
80 |
| |
| 5.3.1
Background |
80 |
| 5.3.2
Purpose |
81 |
| 5.3.3
Definition of the problem |
81 |
| 5.3.4
Limitations of conventional approaches |
81 |
| 5.3.5
Value of life-cycle concepts to address
this problem |
82 |
| 5.3.6
Obstacles |
83 |
| 5.3.7
Overcoming obstacles |
84 |
| 5.3.8
Communication |
84 |
| |
| 5.4 Case
study: USEPA waste minimization and
combustion strategy |
85 |
| |
| 5.4.1
Introduction |
85 |
| 5.4.2
Purpose |
85 |
| 5.4.3
Limitations of conventional approach |
85 |
| 5.4.4
Value of life-cycle concepts |
86 |
| 5.4.5
Obstacles |
86 |
| 5.4.6
Overcoming obstacles |
87 |
| |
| 5.5 Case
study USEPA industrial laundries effluent
guideline |
87 |
| |
| 5.5.1
Background |
87 |
| 5.5.2
Purpose |
88 |
| 5.5.3
Limitations of conventional approach |
88 |
| 5.5.4
Value of life-cycle concepts |
88 |
| 5.5.5
Obstacles and overcoming obstacles |
90 |
| 5.5.6
Communication |
90 |
| |
| 5.6 Case
study: incorporating LCA concepts in
a degreasing rule |
91 |
| |
| 5.6.1
Background |
91 |
| 5.6.2
Purpose |
91 |
| 5.6.3
Limitations of conventional approach |
91 |
| 5.6.4
Value of life-cycle concepts |
92 |
| 5.6.5
Applying life-cycle concepts |
92 |
| 5.6.6
Obstacles |
92 |
| 5.6.7
Lessons learned |
93 |
| |
| 5.7 Case
study: Dutch system for continuous environmental
improvements in consumer products |
93 |
| |
| 5.7.1
Background |
93 |
| 5.7.2
Purpose |
93 |
| 5.7.3
Limitations of conventional approach |
94 |
| 5.7.4
Value of life-cycle concepts |
94 |
| 5.7.5
Obstacles |
95 |
| 5.7.6
Overcoming obstacles |
96 |
| 5.7.7
Communication |
97 |
| 5.7.8
Summary |
97 |
| |
| 5.8.1
Lack of education |
98 |
| 5.8.2
Lack of acceptance of life-cycle concepts
as decision-making tools |
99 |
| 5.8.3
Lack of stakeholder participation /
partnerships |
99 |
| 5.8.4
Requirements for data confidentiality |
100 |
| 5.8.5
Difficulty in defining scope / boundaries |
100 |
| 5.8.6
Shortage of time and resources and inability
to reduce costs |
101 |
| 5.8.7
Lack of tools and data |
101 |
| |
| 5.9 LCA
in strategic policy planning: international
perspectives |
101 |
| 5.10 Observations
and recommendations |
103 |
| |
| 5.10.1
Observations |
103 |
| 5.10.2
Recommendations |
103 |
| |
| Chapter
6: Environmental Technology |
115 |
| |
| 6.1.1
Overview: technology, public policy,
and life-cycle concepts |
105 |
| 6.1.2
Definitions |
105 |
| 6.1.3
Relationship of technology to public
policy |
106 |
| 6.1.4
Relationship of LCA to public policy |
106 |
| 6.1.5
Using LCA in policy to promote environmental
technology |
107 |
| 6.1.6
Integrations framework |
108 |
| |
| 6.2 A framework
for the use of life-cycle concepts in
public policy |
111 |
| |
| 6.2.1
Introduction: some policy considerations
and principles |
111 |
| 6.2.2
Research, development, and demonstration
policy |
112 |
| 6.2.3
Regulatory policy (U.S.) |
113 |
| 6.2.4
Market stimulus (market-based) policies |
113 |
| 6.2.5
Fiscal policy |
114 |
| 6.2.6
International commerce & foreign aid |
114 |
| 6.2.7
Education and training |
115 |
| 6.2.8
Information and dissemination |
115 |
| |
| 6.3 Life-cycle
applications to public policy for environmental
technology |
116 |
| 6.4 Life-cycle
applications in public policy development |
118 |
| |
| 6.4.1
Study introduction and purpose |
118 |
| 6.4.2
Case studies examined |
118 |
| 6.4.3
Results and discussion |
121 |
| 6.4.4
LCA as a tool in forming environmental
public policy |
123 |
| 6.4.5
Key findings |
126 |
| |
|
|
Return to Alphabetical
List
|